Darts / 【King’s JAPAN】Second Edition90 Skyscraper Neo 2BA
( 1 )

SPEC

Category Soft-tip Darts
Maker King's JAPAN
Materials Tungsten 90%
Shape Torpedo
Cut Ring Cut , Vertical Cut , Mulch Cut
Length 43.0mm
Weight (barrel Only) 17.5g
Standard 2BA
Maximum Diameter 7.8mm
Center Of Gravity Center
King’s JAPAN
Second Edition90 Skyscraper Neo 2BA
PRICE: JPY11,700
Expected:USD 75.68

Expected at JPY 154.59 for 1 USD.

This exchange rate is the closing price of yesterday ( 4/18 ).

The actual exchange rate will be determined when the order is paid.

kjd0031

Another Standard

  • 【King’s JAPAN】Second Edition90 Skyscraper Neo No.5

    No.5

Product information

King's JAPAN Second Edition90
Skyscraper Neo

The third model in the collaboration with KTM.
A part of the sales of this product will be donated to the Great East Japan Earthquake relief fund.

The popular Skyscraper is back with a new shape!
The gentle curve in the front has become a straight line, and you can feel the sharp flight more.
The weight is reduced by 2g from the previous Skyscraper.
Orthodox weight, has become a model that is easy to handle for everyone.

Specifications
Tungsten:90
Max width:7.8mm
Length:43.0mm
Weight:17.5g
Balance : Center

Japan Review

4.00

1 Reviews

0
1
0
0
0
Sort By :

2015-07-20

This is a review of the first week of use.

I was actually going to buy the 19.5g one, but after much agonizing, I bought this one.
I used to use 9FIVE (soft model) and it felt quite light compared to it. Skyscraper 19g including settings, 9FIVE is 20g.(L shaft 370 + shape)

The first thing I noticed was the indentation in the center.
I have a deep grip, but this indentation hit my index finger when I gripped it.
It took me a while to get used to it.

I think the cut is quite good.
I have never used this vertical cut before, but I thought the feel was good and the finger contact was not too strong or weak.
The acceleration (knobiness) when the force is transmitted well is pleasant.

I am wondering how durable the cut will be.
If the durability is good, I would give it 5 stars, but since I don't know yet, I'll give it 4 stars tentatively.

6 people found this helpful