【TARGET】K-FLEX SHAPE intermediate Black 410001 's Japan Review

Aside from the bad flying, four of the wires broke from the root in one month.
Be careful if you fall often.

I purchased a repeat. It is a product that has been making a lot of noise, but I personally thought it was a completely different product. I like it because it has a unique feel when thrown among the shaft and flight integration products. I thought they were thinking about the user by having a variation in length. I think it is important to respond to user demand.

It is a product that is making a lot of noise in the world.
Personally, I was under the impression that the shaft is flexible, CONDOR AXE, with a flexible shaft.

For better or worse, it could be a good combination of CONDOR and CONDOR AXE, or it could be neither,
I would like to compare the two products, but not which one is better. I would like to compare the two products, regardless of which one is better.

Price: CONDOR AXE＞＞＞K-FLEX≒CONDOR
　Almost the same price as CONDOR, and more than 60% of CONDOR AXE's price.
Weight: K-FLEX is about 0.1g lighter on average.
Shape: From a distance, it is hard to tell the difference between the CONDOR AXE and the K-FLEX (lol).
Characteristics: The upper and lower parts of the flight seem to be double-layered with resin.
　　　　Is this to prevent damage to the flight when it is stuck?
　　　　The shaft part is flexible. This is a specification not seen in the CONDOR AXE.
　　　　In terms of flexibility, I would say CONDOR>>K-FLEX＞＞＞＞CONDOR AXE.
Durability: I have not compared them over a long period of time, so I will omit that.
Experiment: The recovery of the flight under pressure is CONDOR＞＞＞＞CONDOR AXE＞＞＞＞K-FLEX
　　　　I think it is unexpected stress, but the durability (restoration) of the flight part may be low.

A product that I felt would be an option.
I usually use the standard, so I would like to try it when it is commercialized.