【TARGET】tas0023 ショート (19.0mm) White 's Japan Review
4.50
4 Reviews
|
3 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
2019-08-24
I heard a rumor that paper flights are hard to pull off, so I tried using them, but they really don't pull off. I recommend it to those who use paper flights and are not particular about the shaft.
There are also five different sizes in 3.5mm increments, from short to medium (19mm to 33mm), so those who want to know the changes caused by different shaft lengths may make new discoveries by using them.
However, the shaft ring? (If you use a shaft ring (a ring with a hole in the flight), you will not be able to insert the flight all the way into the shaft.
If you want to adjust the weight by using a ring, you need to be careful.
1 people found this helpful
2014-06-08
It is a very good shaft.
Even if you use the folded flight as it is, it will hardly come off.
Also, if you attach an L-flight that is compatible with champagne rings, the flight will be even harder to come off than if you attach an L-flight to an L-shaft.
It feels good to the touch and is inexpensive, so why not give it a try?
5 people found this helpful
2014-05-18
Probably developed by studying the Raro shaft, it has a similar shape and similar strength.
However, the slit for inserting the flight is tighter than that of the Raro, and the ring further tightens it.
Its hardness to come off is top class, and if you put the ring through before inserting the flight, it will hold it tight. (No need to drill a hole in the flight for the ring!)
It's inexpensive, and if you're going to use folding flights, this is a definite choice for beginners and advanced fliers alike.
11 people found this helpful
2012-12-18
Shocking holding power, hard to get out of the flight.
0 people found this helpful