【L-shaft】L Shaft fls0001 ["Slim"] [] 300 (30.0mm) White 's Japan Review
4.25
8 Reviews
|
4 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
2012-06-08
I got it before others and would like to review it.
The size is almost the same as the Laro 260 (in-between the barrel joint and the tip of the flight), so those who have been using that size for a long time will be able to move on without any discomfort.
Normal L-rings can also be used.
(The note "L-Shaft is a dedicated shaft for champagne rings and shell locks. (The note "*L-Shaft is for champagne rings and shell locks only" is supposed to mean "use champagne rings or shell locks due to the risk of damage from contact with subsequent arrows.)
) Because it is a slim type, it is slightly flexible when force is applied to it. Please be careful when storing...
4 people found this helpful
2012-06-22
I write this in comparison to the Raro shaft.
It is stronger than the Raro shaft.
The Laro shaft is made of a tough material, so it is less likely to break.
There is not a single person around me who uses it.
The length of the shaft itself is the same as the length of aluminum shafts, so the length development is somewhat strange, but it is a matter of getting used to it, so I guess it is just a matter of time.
Personally, I prefer a little longer length than INVITO, so I am glad to see it.
Of course, the 300 size is longer than the Invito, so I used this one.
I used to use it with Champagne Flights.
It is true that the champagne flights themselves lasted longer.
I am sure this effect is true when you protect the protruding flights.
As for the locking function, it is indeed strong. If you put it on tightly, it won't come off.
It does not come off when grouping.
To be honest, it is not good for grouping.
It is perfect for those who want a shaft that locks securely and is hard to break.
If you are thinking about grouping, I suggest you don't use champagne rings.
Or, I recommend you to put it in asap.
3 people found this helpful
2013-05-15
I wanted a longer shaft and bought the 370.
It is a little more flexible than the regular L-Shaft.
I appreciate that it is harder to be played, but I am worried about the durability.
The holding power is still outstanding and does not pull out at all.
It is lightweight, so even though it is long, I don't feel the weight very much.
As expected, the locking type is more stable than the spin type and very easy to throw.
1 people found this helpful
2017-02-19
I had tried many plastic, aluminum, and carbon shafts and was at my wit's end because they broke or bent every time they fell on the floor (the floor material is hard...), but a professional friend of mine recommended the L I tried the L shaft, which was recommended by a professional I know, and although it broke at the threaded part once, it has not broken since then, and the weight of the shaft is better than I expected.
I am currently using the lock, but would like to try the silent next time.
1 people found this helpful
2012-06-16
I was the same way, but at first I felt that the flight would come off easily with this shaft.
But that was because I was using it the wrong way (lol) and the flights were not inserted properly.
It is necessary to insert the shaft without any gap up to the part of the protrusion that is used as a flight guard.
It is a little difficult to insert at first, so please hold the flight and shaft firmly and insert it with a grizzle.
If you insert the shaft tightly without any gaps, it will be locked and will not come out in a short time. I recommend this shaft.
It would be better if there were more color variations.
2 people found this helpful
2013-01-03
It is very durable and has only broken once so far.
I think it is very cost-effective because it lasts a long time.
I also like that the flights are easy to insert.
1 people found this helpful
2013-01-12
I've tried a lot of different shafts, and this one is just as good.
Especially the color of this series is bright and stylish!
0 people found this helpful
2013-01-15
Designed to be used in conjunction with champagne rings or shell locks
and are therefore perfectly compatible with them.
0 people found this helpful